Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01065
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ASEMANI v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 1:2021cv03085
Petitioner: BILLY G. ASEMANI
Defendant: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ASEMANI v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2018cv02344
Plaintiff: BILLY G. ASEMANI
Defendant: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01459
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02268
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ASEMANI v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2010cv01548
Plaintiff: BILLY G. ASEMANI
Defendant: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASEMANI v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01158
Plaintiff: BILLY G. ASEMANI
Defendant: SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC, BASHAR AL-ASSAD, SYRIAN MILITARY INTELLIGENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASEMANI v. MAHMOOD AHMADINEJAD
as 1:2009cv00954
Plaintiff: BILLY G. ASEMANI
Defendant: MAHMOOD AHMADINEJAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00611
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ASEMANI v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00101
Petitioner: BILLY G. ASEMANI
Respondent: MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?