Cases 1 - 6 of 6
New Mexico Top Organics v. Kennedy, et al
as 19-2030
Defendant / Appellant:
RAINA BINGHAM, in their official capacities, LARRY KENNEDY and DAN MOURNING
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO TOP ORGANICS - ULTRA HEALTH, INC.
Wall Street PR Inc. et al v. Mitopharm Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
Wall Street PR Inc. and Charles E Bingham, Jr
Defendant:
Mitopharm Inc. and Peter Pak Cheung
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Gilmore, et al v. Weatherford, et al
as 11-5025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. GILMORE, TAMMY S. GILMORE SPRINGER and JOANNA K. STAND, individual owners in Indian trust property
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHY J. WEATHERFORD, personal representative of the estate of Joseph E. Mountford, deceased and BINGHAM SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY, INC., a foreign corporation
Gilmore et al v. Salazar et al
as 4:2010cv00257
Plaintiff:
James E Gilmore , Tammy S Gilmore Springer and Joanna K Stand
Defendant:
Ken Salazar, Robert K Impson, Paul Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Cole, et al v. Asarco Incorporated, et al
as 4:2003cv00327
Plaintiff:
Betty Jean Cole , John Frazier , Patsy Huffman and others
Defendant:
Blue Tee Corporation , Goldfields Mining Corporation and Doe Run Corporation, The
Counter_claimant:
Goldfields Mining Corporation and Blue Tee Corporation
Counter_defendant:
Picher, City of and Picher/Cardin School Board
Third_party_plaintiff:
Doe Run Corporation, The and Asarco Incorporated
Third_party_defendant:
United States of America
Intervenor:
Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
McClellan et al v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services et al
as 5:2008cv01133
Plaintiff:
Geneva McClellan, Geneva McClellan, Marjorie Bell and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Howard Hendrick, Howard Hendrick and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
