Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Smith v. DeWalt Industrial Tool Company et al
as 3:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
Thomas Richard Smith
Defendant:
DeWalt Industrial Tool Company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Berkowitz et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01438
Plaintiff:
JEROME JAY BERKOWITZ, GREGORY ALLEN AKERVIK, ANGELA ALBERTSON and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Green et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andy Green, Jr., Tina Culclager, Tangie Sims and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Erickson et al v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00986
Plaintiff:
Timothy John Erickson and Kim M. Erickson
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker Inc and Black & Decker (US) Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Breakell v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2019cv00583
Defendant:
Continental Automotive Systems Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., Maremont Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Adam M. Breakell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Jackman v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.
as 2:2016cv01220
Plaintiff:
William R Jackman
Defendant:
Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jackman v. Black & Decker (US) Inc
as 3:2016cv01220
Plaintiff:
William R Jackman
Defendant:
Black & Decker (US) Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ring's End, Inc. et al v. Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc.
as 3:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
Ring's End, Inc. and Federal Insurance Co.
Defendant:
Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
