Cases 1 - 10 of 25
BMBP v. Shane Jeffries, et al
as 22-35857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, an Oregon non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANE JEFFRIES, in his official capacity as Ochoco National Forest Supervisor and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2022cv01500
Plaintiff:
Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project
Defendant:
Homer Wilkes, United States Department of Agriculture, Glenn Casamassa and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest Service et al
as 2:2021cv01033
Plaintiff:
Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Craig P Trulock and Craig P. Trulock
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. Jeffries et al
as 2:2020cv02158
Plaintiff:
Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project
Defendant:
United States Forest Service and shane jeffries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
League of Wilderness Defenders v. USFS, et al
as 18-35731
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS/BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and SLATER R. TURNER, District Ranger, Crooked River National Grassland and Lookout Mountain, Ochoco National Forest, in his official capacity
League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest Service et al
as 2:2016cv01648
Plaintiff:
League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project
Defendant:
Slater R. Turner and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
League of Wilderness Defenders v. USFS, et al
as 14-35683
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS/BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and KENT CONNAUGHTON, Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region of the Forest Service, in his official capacity
The Lands Council, et al v. USFS, et al
as 14-35176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE LANDS COUNCIL, HELLS CANYON PRESERVATION COUNCIL and LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS-BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
ASOTIN COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington and AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
League of Wilderness Defenders, et al v. Kent Connaughton, et al
as 13-35653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS/BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, an Oregon nonprofit corporation and HELLS CANYON PRESERVATION COUNCIL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
KENT CONNAUGHTON, Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region of the Forest Service, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
BAKER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, UNION COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, BOISE CASCADE WOOD PRODUCTS, a Delaware limited liability company and others
League of Wilderness Defenders v. USFS, et al
as 13-35066
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS/BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and KENT CONNAUGHTON, Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region of the Forest Service, in his official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
