Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al v. Stiles Consulting Firm LLC dba Stiles Foodservice & Stainless Installation et al
as 2:2023cv10858
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Southern California Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee and others
Defendant:
Stiles Consulting Firm LLC dba Stiles Foodservice & Stainless Installation, Corey William Stiles and Stiles Consulting Firm LLC doing business as Stiles Foodservice & Stainless Installation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al v. Superior Air Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00907
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 206 Health Benefit Trust and others
Defendant:
Superior Air Inc, Vinod Jothilingam and Vandana Ahuja
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Matrix Air Balance Inc et al
as 2:2021cv05649
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Southern California Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee and others
Defendant:
Matrix Air Balance Inc and Steven Koll Brockman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
