Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al v. Royal Metal Works Inc et al
as 2:2013cv03306
Defendant:
William Paul Blazvick, Angelo Michael Iannucci and Royal Metal Works Inc
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of Local 88 Apprentice Training and Journeyman Educational Fund, Board of Trustees of Local 88 Industry Stabilization Program, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 88 Retiree Health Plan and others
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al v. Southwest Air Conditioning Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01903
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of Local 88 Apprentice Training and Journeyman Educational Fund, Board of Trustees of Local 88 Industry Stabilization Program, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 88 Retiree Health Plan and others
Defendant:
Gary Halverson, Tye Halverson and Southwest Air Conditioning Inc
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al v. Liberty Duct LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00559
Defendant:
James Barton, Carlos Gonzalez, Liberty Duct LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of Local 88 Apprentice Training and Journeyman Educational Fund, Board of Trustees of Local 88 Industry Stabilization Program, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 88 Retiree Health Plan and others
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al v. Ideal Mechanical Inc et al
as 2:2012cv04029
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of Local 88 Apprentice Training and Journeyman Educational Fund, Board of Trustees of Local 88 Industry Stabilization Program, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 88 Retiree Health Plan and others
Defendant:
James R Broughton, Ideal Mechanical Inc, Catherine A Vuckovic and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
