Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Matuguina v. City of Boise, et al.
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Brian John Matuguina
Defendant:
City of Boise, Boise Police Department, Kip Paporello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clyne v. Valley, et al.
as 1:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Heath Thomas Clyne
Defendant:
Warden Randy Valley, Deputy Warden McKay, Deputy Warden Brets and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currie v. Officer Blake Slater et al
as 1:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
Cyrus Currie
Respondent:
Officer Blake Slater, Boise Police Department and Daniel Dinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickett v. Boise Police Department, et al.
as 1:2020cv00379
Defendant:
Kepa Zubizarreta, Matthew Bryngelson, Amy Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis J Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimmy Moore v. City of Boise, et al
as 18-35377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY C. MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BOISE, BOISE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAN MUGUIRA and others
Wallace v. Beaunoin et al
as 1:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Louis Andrew Wallace
Defendant:
Tim Beaunoin, Adam Crist, Cory Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weimer v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2017cv00002
Petitioner:
Shane C Weimer
Respondent:
State of Idaho, Ada County Public Defenders, Ada County Prosecutors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conerly v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2015cv00516
Plaintiff:
Detrick Curtis Conerly
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Ada County and Boise Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Boise Police Department
as 1:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Shawn N Fisher
Defendant:
Boise Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Colson et al
as 1:2012cv00344
Plaintiff:
Terrence Matthews
Defendant:
Chris Colson, Chip Morgan, City of Boise Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
