Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sewak v. Arvinmeritor, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00590
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Sewak
Defendant:
Arvinmeritor, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Ltd. , Bird, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
RSCC Wire & Cable L.L.C.
Cross_defendant:
RSCC Wire & Cable L.L.C., Arvinmeritor, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Nablo et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Coproration et al
as 1:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
David V. Nablo and Claire A. Nablo
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Coproration , Borgwarner Morse TEC, Inc. , CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Union Carbide Corporation
Cross_defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation , Air & Liquid Systems Coproration , American Standard Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Resch v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv08977
Plaintiff:
John Resch
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, Asbestos Corporation Ltd. and others
Cross_claimant:
Union Carbide Corporation
Cross_defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, 84 Lumber Company, A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Wildfire v. Borgwarner Morse TEC, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08632
Plaintiff:
Roger A. Wildfire
Defendant:
Borgwarner Morse TEC, Inc., CBS Corporation, Charles A. Wagner Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Kittredge v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv05527
Plaintiff:
Betsy Kittredge
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ammco Tools, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. v. Waxman Industrial Services Corp.
as 5:2010cv01076
Defendant:
Waxman Industrial Services Corp.
Plaintiff:
Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. v. Waxman Industrial Services Corp.
as 7:2010cv01076
Defendant:
Waxman Industrial Services Corp.
Plaintiff:
Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
