Cases 1 - 10 of 25
David v. British American Tobacco p.l.c et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Gary David
Defendant:
British American Tobacco p.l.c, Jack Marie Henry David Bowles, Tadeu Marroco and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Delgado v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 2:2022cv05262
Plaintiff:
Ileana Delgado
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Case v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv05205
Plaintiff:
Harrington Case
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc., Bowlero Corp., AMF Bowling Centers, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Chingo Garcia v. Hatchet Works Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv03222
Plaintiff:
Rolando Chingo Garcia
Defendant:
Hatchet Works Corp., Jonathan D. Sussman, Rita Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03598
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schwartz v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 2:2019cv07096
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Center, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Schwartz v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 1:2019cv07096
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Center, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
