Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Southern Refuge, LLC v. Bondurant et al
as 2:2023mc00007
Plaintiff:
Southern Refuge, LLC
Defendant:
E. Brad Bondurant and Bond Arch, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Brad SmithIn re: Brad Smith
as 23-13813
Petitioner:
In re: BRAD LAMONT SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KINSEY et al v. WARNER ROBINS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
INONDA RENA KINSEY, INONDA REINA KINSEY EL and DARIUS SCOTT RICHARDSON
Defendant:
WARNER ROBINS POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER BISH, OFFICER BRAD BAURDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Gates v. Trump et al
as 1:2022mi00081
Plaintiff:
Andrew Steven Gates
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Antony J. Blinken, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Gates v. Trump et al
as 1:2022mi00082
Plaintiff:
Amanda Gates
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Antony J. Blinken and Brad Raffensperger
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Bacarella v. Lilly Finance et al
as 0:2022cv61942
Plaintiff:
Caesar Bacarella
Defendant:
Lilly Finance, Lillian Finance, LLC, Lillian Bay Foundation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Smith v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Brad M. Smith
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brad SmithIn re: Brad Smith
as 22-10353
Petitioner:
In re: BRAD LAMONT SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
