Other Statutes Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
C&A MARKETING, INC. v. NOIA et al
as 2:2023cv20775
Plaintiff: C&A MARKETING, INC.
Defendant: MARK NOIA, RAGHNALL RAFI, BRAD CHAPMAN and others
COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, INC., v. SCHWARZ
as 3:2022cv00306
Plaintiff: COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant: BRAD SCHWARZ
KILLEEN v. NIC INC. et al
as 3:2021cv07922
Defendant: JAYAPRAKASH VIJAYAN, WILLIAM M. LYONS, PETE WILSON and others
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS KILLEEN
STRICKLAND v. CIT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00696
Defendant: MICHAEL A CARPENTER, WILLIAM M FREEMAN, R BRAD OATES and others
Plaintiff: SHAWN STRICKLAND
KONDER v. CIT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2020cv18449
Defendant: DORENE C. DOMINGUEZ, WILLIAM M. FREEMAN, KHANH T. TRAN and others
Plaintiff: ZOLTAN KONDER
RHODA v. CIT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2020cv17547
Defendant: DORENE C. DOMINGUEZ, R. BRAD OATES, WILLIAM M. FREEMAN and others
Plaintiff: BRENT RHODA
Strougo v. Mallinckrodt Public Limited Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv10100
Defendant: Matthew K. Harbaugh, BRYAN M. REASONS, Mark C. Trudeau and others
Petitioner: Delbert Smith, Dennis Dauenhauer, BRAD DAVIS and others
Lead Plaintiff: Canadian Elevator Industry Pension Trust Fund
Plaintiff: Barbara Strougo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 j
C. REGAN ET. AL et al v. CONWAY
as 2:2018cv09440
Plaintiff: C. REGAN ET. AL, AUTOCLEAR, LLC and HAZIM AUDALLA
Defendant: BRAD CONWAY
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
REGAN et al v. CONWAY et al
as 2:2018cv02104
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER REGAN , DAVID BONDY , TODD CONWAY and others
Defendant: BRAD CONWAY and HAZIM AUDALLA
Intervenor: CONTROL SCREENING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PACKER v. RAGING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv08110
Plaintiff: BRAD PACKER
Defendant: RAGING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, RAGING CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD., WILLIAM C. MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?