Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Jones v. Singh et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Darlene Jones
Defendant:
Jagdeep Singh, Timonthy Holme, Kevin Hettrich and others
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Keith Dial
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Wheels Up Experience Inc.
Wilhelm v. Conformis, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Conformis, Inc., Kenneth Fallon III, Mark Augusti and others
Ballard v. Benefitfocus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01640
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
Benefitfocus, Inc., Matt Levin, Doug A. Dennerline and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hall et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00768
Plaintiff:
Saundra Hall, Danielle Hamilton, Virginia Hamm and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Andres et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
January Andres, Simao Anton, Steven Brittain and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Katerra Inc. v. Marks et al
as 1:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Katerra Inc.
Defendant:
Michael E. Marks, Matthew W. Marsh, Ga-Lane Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Heartland Group Ventures, LLC et al
as 1:2022mc00067
Defendant:
Manjit Singh Sahota, The Heartland Group Ventures, LLC, Heartland Production and Recovery LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Kaufmann v. Momentive Global Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
David Kaufmann
Defendant:
Momentive Global Inc., Susan L. Decker, David A. Ebersman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
