Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Mitchell v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 26-4511
Plaintiff: DEANGELO LAMONT MITCHELL
Defendant: NETHANJAH BREITENBACH and KATIE FRAKER
Wells v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 26-4442
Petitioner: CHASE WELLS
Respondent: NETHANJAH BREITENBACH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Martin v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 26-4336
Petitioner: WILLIAM MARTIN
Respondent: NETHANJAH BREITENBACH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mitchell v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 26-4292
Plaintiff: DONALD E. MITCHELL, JR.
Defendant: NETHANJAH BREITENBACH, UNKNOWN HARRIS, Dismissed per ECF No. 10 Order, ROBERT HARTMAN and others
Rodriguez-Quezada v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-4097
Petitioner: JOSE RODRIGUEZ-QUEZADA
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, KYLE OLSEN and NETHANJAH BREITENBACH
Abraham v. Breitenbach et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2026cv05089
Plaintiff: Joshua Abraham
Defendant: Matthew Breitenbach, Breitenbach Real Estate Development Inc., Breitenbach Advisory Team LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hines v. Dzurenda, et al.
as 26-3778
Plaintiff: TONY HINES
Defendant: JAMES DZURENDA, BREITENBACH, Warden, ROBERT SUWE and others
Damon Lee Dunagan v. Nethanjah Breitenbach et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2026cv00399
Petitioner: Damon Lee Dunagan
Respondent: Warden Nethanjah Breitenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-3240
Petitioner: JOHNNY WILLIAM JOHNSON, III
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, NETHANJAH BREITENBACH and C. JOHNSON
Evans v. Parks et al
as 3:2026cv00375
Plaintiff: Michael Evans
Defendant: Erin Parks, Kenneth L. Williams, Leilani Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?