Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mitchell v The Brooklyn Hospital Center
as 1:2014cv04359
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mitchell
Defendant:
The Brooklyn Hospital Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Torres v. The Brooklyn Hospital Center
as 1:2012cv01594
Defendant:
The Brooklyn Hospital Center
Plaintiff:
Celina Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brooklyn Hospital Center v. Local 282 Welfare Fund
as 1:2011cv02790
Plaintiff:
Brooklyn Hospital Center
Defendant:
Local 282 Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nakahata v. New York-Presbyterian HealthCa
as 11-734
Plaintiff:
Diane Lee Sussman, Stevie Hariston, Carole Tassy and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Masahiro Nakahata, on behalf of herself and all other employers similarly situated and Diana Gardocki, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated
Defendant:
New York-Presbyterian Fund, Inc., New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Brooklyn Hospital Center and others
Defendant - Appellee:
New York-Presbyterian HealthCare System, Inc., Herbert Pardes, New York and Presbyterian Hospital and others
New York State Nurses Association, Inc. v. The Brooklyn Hospital Center et al
as 1:2010cv05474
Plaintiff:
New York State Nurses Association, Inc.
Defendant:
The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Nephro Care Inc., New York Dialysis Management Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Nakahata v. New York-Presbyterian HealthCare System, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02661
Plaintiff:
Masahiro Nakahata
Defendant:
New York-Presbyterian HealthCare System, Inc., New York-Presbyterian Fund, Inc., New York-Presbyterian Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brooklyn Hospital Center v. Casta et al
as 1:2007cv02082
Plaintiff:
Brooklyn Hospital Center
Defendant:
Lizette Casta and Local 272 Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
