Cases 81 - 90 of 139
Burger King Corporation v. Dean Liuzzi Restaurants, Inc., et al
as 1:2010cv22380
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Dean Liuzzi Restaurants Inc., Dean Anthony Liuzzi and Mary C. Liuzzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Family Dining, Inc. v. Burger King Corporation
as 1:2010cv21964
Plaintiff:
Family Dining, Inc.
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burger King Corporation v. Patel
as 1:2010cv21610
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Harshad C Patel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
J.S. Foods General Partnership v. Burger King Corporation
as 3:2010cv01050
Plaintiff:
J.S. Foods General Partnership
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burger King Corporation v. JS Foods General Partnership et al
as 1:2010cv21443
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
JS Foods General Partnership, Josephson Management, Inc., Smiedt Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burger King Corporation v. Harting
as 1:2010cv20853
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Steven A Harting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Burger King Corporation v. Balantzian
as 1:2010cv20592
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Linda D Balantzian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Burger King Corporation v. Huynh et al
as 1:2010cv20576
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
John Q Huynh, Parvez M Sheikh and Ahoa Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burger King Corporation v. Odykirk et al
as 1:2010cv20534
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Daniel R. Odykirk, William C. Odykirk and Ody Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Burger King Corporation v. Cepiel
as 1:2010cv20503
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Donald M. Cepiel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
