Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BURNS
as 1:2024cv00838
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
Stephen Scott Burns
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
DOE v. BURNS et al
as 1:2023cv02937
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. BURNS, DOUG VAN ZANDT, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
DUNG v. EMMEL et al
as 1:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
CHIEM MINH DUNG
Defendant:
ALISSA EMMEL, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ISOM v. PAXTON et al
as 1:2022cv03558
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
KEN PAXTON, SCOTT LEKAM, AVRIL HAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IN RE SUBPOENA ISSUED TO BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2022mc00108
In Re:
SUBPOENA ISSUED TO BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Respondent:
EUGENE BURNS
CHEN v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2022cv02143
Plaintiff:
JIE CHEN
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, IAN G. BROWNLEE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ALTSCHULD et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2021cv02779
Plaintiff:
DAN ET AL ALTSCHULD, DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO and others
Not Classified By Court:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Defendant:
Secretary GINA M. RAIMONDO and GINA M. RAIMONDO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
LEE v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv03611
Defendant:
ROSALIND SARGENT-BURNS, KATHLEEN M. HAWK SAWYER, JEFFREY A ROSEN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BURNS v. ANDERSON
as 1:2016mc02509
Plaintiff:
DONALD A. BURNS
Defendant:
WALTER C. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
BURNS v. MCDONALD
as 1:2014mc01417
Plaintiff:
BRENDA BURNS
Defendant:
ROBERT MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
