Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cabrera v. Neven et al
as 2:2014cv02162
Petitioner:
Charlie M. Cabrera
Respondent:
C Masto and Dwight Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox v. NDOC et al
as 3:2014cv00145
Defendant:
(Asst.)(Ms.) Luce, (Ms.) Young, (N) Margaret and others
Plaintiff:
Michael-Steve Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul McCreary v. Catherine Masto, et al
as 13-16406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL THOMAS MCCREARY
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHERINE C. MASTO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, Govenor and JAMES G. COX, Director of Prisons
Paul McCreary v. Catherine Masto, et al
as 12-17635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL THOMAS MCCREARY
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHERINE C. MASTO, BRIAN SANDOVAL and JAMES C. COX
McCreary v. Masto et al
as 3:2012cv00631
Defendant:
James G. Cox, Catherine C. Masto and Brian Sandoval
Plaintiff:
Paul McCreary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCreary v. Masto et al
as 3:2012cv00590
Defendant:
James C Cox, Catherine C. Masto and Brian Sandoval
Plaintiff:
Paul McCreary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Cox v. E. McDaniel, et al
as 12-16380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVE COX
Defendant - Appellee:
E. K. MCDANIEL, D. BROOKS, R. BAKER and others
Johnson v. Nash et al
as 3:2010cv00197
Defendant:
Board of Commissioners, Board of Examiners, Willie Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisle v. Baker et al
as 3:2009cv00479
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Lisle
Defendant:
Rene Baker, Robert Bannister, Joe Brackbill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everett v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2009cv00484
Petitioner:
Gregory L. Everett
Respondent:
State of Nevada, E.K. McDaniel, Catherine C. Masto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
