Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Michaels (PS) et al v. Lepe et al
as 1:2024cv01116
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wayne Michaels and Eli Joseph Chapman
Defendant:
C. Lepe, Espinosa, S. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zogheib (PS) v. Lepe
as 1:2024cv00697
Petitioner:
Jihad Anthony Zogheib
Respondent:
C. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Colley (PS) v. Lepe
as 1:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Terry Jerome Colley
Respondent:
C. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford (PS) v. Lepe
as 1:2024cv00287
Petitioner:
Killiu Ford
Respondent:
C. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alexander v. Lepe
as 1:2023cv03228
Petitioner:
Craig Alexander
Respondent:
C. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clark (PS) v. Lepe
as 1:2023cv02351
Petitioner:
Terry Ray Clark
Respondent:
C. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bonales v. Lepe
as 1:2023cv02326
Petitioner:
Steve Maciel Bonales
Respondent:
C. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Lepe
as 1:2023cv02302
Petitioner:
Wayne Edward Williams, ll and Wayne Edward Williams, II
Respondent:
C. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reyes (PS) v. Lepe
as 1:2023cv01952
Petitioner:
Jonathan Reyes
Respondent:
C. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Arterberry v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv01370
Petitioner:
Marcellus Arterberry and Marcellus Temel Arterberry
Respondent:
No Named Respondent and C. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
