Cases 21 - 30 of 21,505
Wardlaw et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Walter A. Wardlaw and Karla J. Wardlaw
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jacobson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02279
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Jacobson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McDonald v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02288
Plaintiff:
Sholonda McDonald
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richardson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02291
Plaintiff:
Belinda Richardson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bussey et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02312
Plaintiff:
Sedrick D. Bussey and Dee Bussey
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bien-Aime v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02311
Plaintiff:
Renee L. Bien-Aime
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chione v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02313
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Chione
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02326
Plaintiff:
Melissa F. Johnson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gatling v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02318
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Gatling
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hiltz-Scerbo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02322
Plaintiff:
Leiza A. Hiltz-Scerbo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
