Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brannen v. Becton, Dickinson and Company et al
as 4:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Sara Brannen
Defendant:
Becton, Dickinson and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Access Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 md MDL: Multidistrict Litigation
Nedved v. Becton, Dickinson and Company et al
as 4:2023cv00214
Defendant:
Carrie Nedved, Becton, Dickson, and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 pl MDL: Products Liability
DeAngelis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00431
Plaintiff:
Lucia DeAngelis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitehead v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
Lillian C. Whitehead
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nepple et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
Annette J Nepple and Charles Nepple, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Covidien PLC, Covidien International Finance SA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beaty v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00570
Plaintiff:
Debra Joanne Beaty
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Milligan et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
Karmen Milligan and Loren Milligan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00104
Plaintiff:
Juanita Lopez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kessel et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jess Kessel and Kimberly Heath-Kessel
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rubio et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00083
Plaintiff:
John Rubio and Kelli Baker-Rubio
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
