Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Chamberlain et al v. Dolo Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Duval Chamberlain, D.Chamberz, Kenley Carmenate and others
Defendant:
Dolo Entertainment, Inc., Isis Naija Gaston, Ephrem Lopez, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Internet Archive et al
as 1:2023cv07133
Plaintiff:
UMG Recordings, Inc., Capitol Records, LLC, Concord Bicycle Assets, LLC and others
Defendant:
Internet Archive, Brewster Kahle, Kahle/Austin Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Keep On Kicking Music, Inc et al v. Universal Music Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04400
Plaintiff:
Keep On Kicking Music, Inc, keep on moving music, Free World Music, Limited and others
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Inc., Universal Music Publishing Group, Quality Control Music and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Waite v. UMG Recordings, Inc.
as 23-195
Plaintiff:
Joe Ely, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Israel Caballero, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Earle R. Ely, Jr., AKA Joe Ely
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Waite, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Stan Sobol, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Stan Lee, Kasim Sulton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Counter Claimant:
Capitol Records, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
UMG Recordings, Inc., DBA Universal Music Group
Defendant:
UMG Recordings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Does 1 though 10
Waite v. UMG Recordings, Inc.
as 23-194
Plaintiff:
Joe Ely, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Israel Caballero, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Earle R. Ely, Jr., AKA Joe Ely
Petitioner:
John Waite, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Stan Sobol, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Stan Lee, Kasim Sulton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
UMG Recordings, Inc., DBA Universal Music Group and Capitol Records, LLC
Defendant:
UMG Recordings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Does 1 though 10
Capitol Records, LLC v. Vimeo, Inc.
as 21-2949
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Capitol Records, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability company, Caroline Records, Inc., a New York Corporation, Virgin Records America, Inc., a California Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Vimeo, Inc., a Delaware Limited Liability company, AKA Vimeo.com and Connected Ventures, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability company
Defendant:
Does, 1-20 inclusive
Amicus Curiae:
National Music Publishers' Association, Inc., Recording Industry Association of America, Inc., Copyright Alliance and others
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Frontier Communications Corporation
as 1:2021cv05050
Plaintiff:
Rhino Entertainment LLC, Arista Records LLC, Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. and others
Defendant:
Frontier Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Waite et al v. UMG Recordings, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01091
Plaintiff:
John Waite, Joe Ely, Stan Sobol and others
Defendant:
Does 1 though 10, UMG Recordings, Inc. a Delaware corporation, UMG Recordings, Inc. doing business as Universal Music Group and others
Counter Claimant:
UMG Recordings, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Susan Straw Harris
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Pickett v. Migos Touring, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv09775
Defendant:
QUALITY CONTROL MUSIC, LLC, Capitol Records LLC and MIGOS TOURING, INC.
Plaintiff:
LEANDER C. PICKETT
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
In Re: Digital Music Antitrust
as 17-2367
Petitioner:
Richard Benham, Ronald Donahue, Rachel Hall and others
Respondent:
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, Inc., Warner Music Group Corp. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
