Cases 1 - 6 of 6
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 17-1053
Petitioner:
State of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Catherine McCabe, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
American Petroleum Institute v. Catherine McCabe, et al
as 17-1046
Petitioner:
American Petroleum Institute
Respondent:
Catherine McCabe, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency
PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC. et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv00253
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC. , NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARK SANDY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551
Alabama Power Company, et al v. EPA, et al
as 17-1031
Petitioner:
Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Catherine McCabe, Acting Administrator
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 17-1022
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Catherine McCabe, Acting Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 17-1021
Petitioner:
State of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Catherine McCabe, In her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
