Cases 1 - 7 of 7
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 469 PENSION FUND AND TRUSTEES THEREOF v. CDJ CONTRACTING CORP. AND TARHEEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
as 3:2021cv17416
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 469 PENSION FUND AND TRUSTEES THEREOF
Defendant:
CDJ CONTRACTING CORP. AND TARHEEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. TARHEEL ENTERPRISES INC. et al
as 3:2020cv02024
Defendant:
ALEXANDER CHRYSANTHOPOULOS, GEORGE CHRYSANTHOPOULOS, TARHEEL QUARRY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. TARHEEL ENTERPRISES INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02024
Defendant:
ALEXANDER CHRYSANTHOPOULOS, GEORGE CHRYSANTHOPOULOS, TARHEEL QUARRY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. TARHEEL ENTERPRISES,INC et al
as 2:2020cv01948
Defendant:
TARHEEL ENTERPRISES,INC, ALEXANDER CHRYSANTHOPOULOS, GEORGE CHRYSANTHOPOULOS and others
Plaintiff:
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POTTER et al v. C.D.J., INC. et al
as 3:2019cv19923
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK P. POTTER, JR., RICK WORKMAN, BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 469 PENSION, WELFARE AND ANNUITY FUNDS AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 469 and others
Defendant:
CDJ CONTRACTING CORP., C.D.J., INC., TARHEEL ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
POTTER, JR. et al v. C.D.J., INC., et al
as 2:2017cv03409
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK P POTTER, JR. , MICHAEL L. BRODERICK , MICHAEL TKATCH and others
Defendant:
C.D.J., INC., CDJ CONTRACTING CORP. and TARHEEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
POTTER et al v. C.D.J., INC. et al
as 3:2016cv02046
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK P. POTTER, JR. , MICHAEL L. BRODERICK , MICHAEL TKATCH and others
Defendant:
C.D.J., INC., CDJ CONTRACTING CORP. and TARHEEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
