Cases 1 - 6 of 6
v. IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH ONE CELL PHONE ACCOUNT STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY VERIZON WIRELESS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATION(S) et al
as 1:2022sc01606
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH ONE CELL PHONE ACCOUNT STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY VERIZON WIRELESS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATION(S)
INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH ONE CELL PHONE ACCOUNT CONTROLLED BY AT&T CORP. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATIONS OF 18 U.S.C. 111, 113(A), 231, 1752(A), AND 4
as 1:2022sc01056
In Re:
INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH ONE CELL PHONE ACCOUNT CONTROLLED BY AT&T CORP. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATIONS OF 18 U.S.C. 111, 113(A), 231, 1752(A), AND 4
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CERTAIN LITHIUM-ION BATTERY CELLS, BATTERY MODULES, BATTERY PACKS, COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING THE SAME et al
as 1:2020mc00034
In Re:
CERTAIN LITHIUM-ION BATTERY CELLS, BATTERY MODULES, BATTERY PACKS, COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING THE SAME
Petitioner:
SK BATTERY AMERICA, INC. and SK INNOVATION CO., LTD
Environmental Health Trust, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-1025
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Petitioner:
Consumers for Safe Cell Phones, Theodora Scarato, Environmental Health Trust and others
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. et al v. 4 U CELL, LLC et al
as 1:2016mc02135
Plaintiff:
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. and SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
Defendant:
4 U CELL, LLC, DENNIS SKELLY and DEBORAH SKELLY
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
CAUDLE v. U.S. MARSHAL CELL BLOCK
as 1:2013cv00399
Plaintiff:
EDWARD E. CAUDLE, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL CELL BLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
