Cases 171 - 180 of 9,232
FRITZ et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65838
Plaintiff:
JIMMY RAY FRITZ and DANA FRITZ
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCNUTT et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64689
Plaintiff:
JOAN M MCNUTT and WILLIAM E MCNUTT
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIRKBRIDDE et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64810
Plaintiff:
KARL F KIRKBRIDDE, JR and PATRICIA A KIRKBRIDE
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RYNIAWEC et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65087
Plaintiff:
DUANE C RYNIAWEC and RUTH ANNE RYNIAWEC
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELTRINGHAM et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66121
Plaintiff:
MILDRED R ELTRINGHAM and CARRIE BOTTORF
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FROST et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv64949
Plaintiff:
RICKY FROST and EILEEN FROST
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ACANDS, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLWOOD v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65899
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. MILLWOOD
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES , INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66119
Plaintiff:
PAUL D. RICE, SR and MARY ANN RICE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES , INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUMALAINEN et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64907
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HUMALAINEN and JOANN HUMANLAINEN
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARKIJOHN et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65210
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN J MARKIJOHN and CHARLOTTE MARKIJOHN
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
