Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01529
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
PHW Las Vegas, LLC v. Westgate Planet Hollywood Las Vegas, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01202
Defendant:
CFI Resorts Management, Inc., Central Florida Investments, Inc., David A. Siegel and others
Counter Defendant:
PHW Las Vegas, LLC
Plaintiff:
PHW Las Vegas, LLC
702) 796-7181 (fax:
Westgate Planet Hollywood Las Vegas, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Westgate Resorts, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Pittman et al v. Westgate Planet Hollywood Las Vegas, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01149
Defendant:
CFI Sales & Marketing, Inc., CFI Sales & Marketing, LLC, CFI Sales & Marketing, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Edith Marshall, Markos Mendoza, Debra Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Pittman et al v. Westgate Planet Hollywood Las Vegas, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00878
Plaintiff:
Debra Pittman, Rosalyne R Smith, Markos Mendoza and others
Defendant:
Westgate Planet Hollywood Las Vegas, LLC, Westgate Planet Hollywood Las Vegas, LLC, Westgate Resorts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis v. Westgate Planet Hollywood Las Vegas, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00722
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis, III and Thomas Davis, III
Defendant:
Westgate Planet Hollywood Las Vegas, LLC, Westgate Planet Hollywood Las Vegas, LLC, Westgate Resorts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
