Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Paul Rich v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-15474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL RICH
Defendant:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Arizona Department of Corrections Director, HERRERA, COII, PITZ, Assistant Warden and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSE TORRES, COII and JEFF RODE, Assistant Warden
Anthony Merrick v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 20-17504
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY JAMES MERRICK
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, in his official capacity, KENNETH HERMAN, Administrator of Pastoral Activities at Arizona Department of Corrections, MARION R. KIDWELL, Senior Chaplain at Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Jeffrey Johnson v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 20-16400
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, State of Arizona and DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFREY GLEN JOHNSON
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Arizona Department of Corrections
Michael Fuqua v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 19-15536
Defendant:
VAN DER NOORD, KIRKOFF, HUDSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HORN, Lieutenant, MOONEY, Deputy Warden, COCA, CO III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA, AKA Michael Fuqua
Joel Hughes v. Dennis Chenail, et al
as 12-16522
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. LOCKHART, DO, DENNIS R. KENDALL, Health Services Division Administrator, KEVIN LEWIS, MD and others
Defendant:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Warden, STATE OF ARIZONA, only for state tort claims, CHARLES L. RYAN, Arizona Department of Corrections Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL M. HUGHES
Joel Hughes v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 12-16522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL M. HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS G. CHENAIL, MICHAEL HEGMANN, Doctor, ROBERT JONES, MD, ADC Physician Hep - C Committe Member and others
Defendant:
JAMES WARREN BAIRD, MD, ADC Medical Program Manager, BANNER HEALTH, DBA Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, ELIZABETH GOODRIDGE, PA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
