Cases 61 - 70 of 243
NICHOLAS v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67874
Plaintiff:
RONALD NICHOLAS
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHULTZ v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67862
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G. SCHULTZ
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TIMM v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67768
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK TIMM
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHY v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67754
Plaintiff:
FLOYD T. SHY
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONDAY v. ACANDS INC
as 2:2010cv67856
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. MONDAY
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
SZYMKOWIAK v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67816
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SZYMKOWIAK
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAXTER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67861
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L. BAXTER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EMANUELE v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67836
Plaintiff:
JOHN J EMANUELE, SR
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSEN v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67859
Plaintiff:
CHARLES J. PETERSEN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRATZ v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67807
Plaintiff:
RONALD BRATZ
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
