Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Charles et al v. Bical Auto Mall, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02074
Plaintiff:
Elmise Charles and Christian Charles
Defendant:
Bical Auto Mall, Inc. and GM Financial Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Williams v. Intuit, Inc.,
as 1:2020cv00320
Defendant:
Intuit, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Christian Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
International Christian Broadcasting, Inc. v. Koper et al
as 2:2012cv03570
Plaintiff:
International Christian Broadcasting, Inc.
Defendant:
Brittany Koper and Michael Koper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lehman v. Rutigliano
as 11-3263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Lehman and Janice Lehman, Individually and as Parents of Christian Lehman, Matthew Lehman and Marissa Lehman
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
John Rutigliano
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, 1-15, Representing unknown and unidentified employees of Countrywide Financial and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (all individually and in their official capacities as employees of Countrywide Home Loans, Incorporated ), John and Jane Does, 16-30, Representing unknown and unidentified employees of Neufville Mortgage Corporation (all individually and in their official capacities as employees of Neufville Mortgage Corporation ), New Century Financial, Incorporated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Paul Harris, Corey J. Covert, Esq., Zornberg & Hirsch, Esqs. and others
Kocourek v. Shrader et al
as 1:2009cv10203
Plaintiff:
Paul Kocourek
Defendant:
Ralph W. Shrader, C.G. Appleby, Samuel R. Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ibarzabal et al v. Morgan Stanley DW, Inc.
as 7:2007cv02273
Plaintiff:
Joe Ibarzabal, Joe Ibarzabal, Joe Ibarzabal and others
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley DW, Inc. and Morgan Stanley DW, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
