Cases 1 - 10 of 19
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25332
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26048
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16376
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv01522
Plaintiff:
Orlando Christopher King, II
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AERO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv27672
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05116
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING-QUICK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv02508
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KING-QUICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREENOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv68298
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KING FREENOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
