Cases 21 - 30 of 224
BURT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22531
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL BURT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WIGLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22079
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WIGLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HERPSTREITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21816
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL HERPSTREITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grissom v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02291
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Grissom
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PIERCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18056
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL PIERCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MULCH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12371
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL MULCH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11795
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL ROBERTSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07448
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL CHAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
REIMER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05313
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL REIMER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROCK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03004
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL BROCK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
