Cases 1 - 7 of 7
City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 14-3224
Defendant:
Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC, Leemilt's Petroleum Inc., Motiva Enterprises, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mobile Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
City of New York, New York City Water Board and New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority
Village of Bethalto v. Ashland, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv08182
Defendant:
BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America, Inc., Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Village of Bethalto
Intervenor Plaintiff:
City of Nokomis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Ramirez et al v. Citgo Refining and Chemicals Company, L.P. et al
as 1:2009cv08231
Plaintiff:
Andra H. Ramirez, Adrian Hinojosa and S'Lena Hinojosa
Defendant:
Citgo Refining and Chemicals Company, L.P., Kerr-McGee Corporation, Kerr-McGee Refining, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
City of Glen Cove Water Department v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv09622
Plaintiff:
City of Glen Cove Water Department
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Atlantic Richfield Company, BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
South Huntington Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv09621
Plaintiff:
South Huntington Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Atlantic Richfield Company, BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
City of Lowell Massachusetts v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2005cv04018
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corp, doing business as Exxon Mobile Refining and Supply Company doing business as Exxon Chemical USA doing business as ExxonMobil Chemical Corporation formerly known as Exxon Corporation, Atlantic Richfield Company individually also known as Arco formerly known as Arco Petroleum Company doing business as Arco Products Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. individually formerly known as Gulf Oil Corporation doing business as Chevron Products Company doing business as Chevron Chemical Company and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
City of Lowell Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2000cv01898
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, American Distilling & Manufacturing Co., Inc., Melanie J. Arcure and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Coastal Oil New England, Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Kewanee Industries Inc., Chevron Puerto Rico LLC and others
Defendant:
Citgo Refining and Chemical Company, L.P., Citgo Refining and Chemicals Company L.P., Coastal Eagle Point Oil Company and others
Cross Claimant:
El Paso Corporation, Lyondell Chemical Company, Ultramar Energy, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Flint Hills Resources, LP, Claudia Christiansen and Hamner institutes for health science, the
4Th Party Plaintiff:
Northville Industries Corp.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Town of Kouts, United Water New York, Inc. and Village of Bethalto
Consolidated Defendant:
Valero Refining Company Texas, L.P., Ashland, Inc., Exxon Mobil Oil Coroporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
A&A McHenry, Inc., Chestnut Mart of Newburgh, Inc., Chestnut Petroleum Dist., Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, American Refining Group Inc.'s, Buckley Energy Group, Ltd. and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Ibrahim Aykanat, George Chapklin, Jr., Stephen Chapklin and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges, Kenneth E. Warner, Kieran Gostin and others
Appellant:
The State of New Hampshire
Intervenor:
United States
Not Classified By Court:
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
