Cases 1 - 10 of 308
King et al v. City National Bank of Florida
as 1:2024cv21733
Plaintiff:
Bradley King, David Hager and Sharon Peacock
Defendant:
City National Bank of Florida
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cameron v. The City of Cape Coral, Florida
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Bret Cameron
Defendant:
The City of Cape Coral, Florida
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Alvarez v. City of Melbourne
as 6:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Elena Alvarez
Defendant:
City of Melbourne
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Williams v. City Furniture Inc
as 0:2024cv60179
Plaintiff:
Rodgery Williams
Defendant:
City Furniture Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Anderson v. Huffman et al
as 8:2023cv02782
Plaintiff:
Erica Anderson
Defendant:
Anne Huffman and City of Haines City, Florida
Not Classified By Court:
Edward J. Page
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
DEAS v. CITY OF PENSACOLA
as 3:2023cv24708
Plaintiff:
EDWARD DEAS
Defendant:
CITY OF PENSACOLA
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA)
Benitez et al v. City of Orlando
as 6:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Felix Benitez, Trenton Campbell, Carl Chantigian and others
Defendant:
City of Orlando
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Peon v. City Furniture, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv61270
Plaintiff:
Marcos Peon
Defendant:
City Furniture, Inc. and Andrew Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Peon v. City Furniture, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv22495
Plaintiff:
Marcos Peon
Defendant:
City Furniture, Inc. and Andrew Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Townsend v. City of Margate
as 0:2023cv61265
Plaintiff:
Phillip Townsend
Defendant:
City of Margate
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
