Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Moon v. Richison et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Chesley Moon
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Henry C. Duques, Robert J. Levenson and others
Ford v. Aberle et al
as 1:2020cv00748
Defendant:
Mark Fields, Donald J. Rosenberg, Jeffrey Henderson and others
Nominal Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Brian Ford
HULL v. CHP III MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv15770
Defendant:
CHP III MANAGEMENT, LLC, JOHN J. CLARKE, JOHN J. PARK and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON H. HULL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blonstein v. GGP, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00679
Plaintiff:
Justin Blonstein
Defendant:
Sandeep Mathrani, Janice R. Fukakusa, Daniel B. Hurwitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stafford et al v. Clarke et al
as 1:2018cv00379
Plaintiff:
Albert Stafford and Jerry Davis
Defendant:
Stephen R. Clarke, Thomas Murphy, Mark Weinswig and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lutzker v. Clarke et al
as 1:2018cv00201
Plaintiff:
Al Lutzker
Defendant:
Stephen R. Clarke, Thomas Murphy, Mark Weinswig and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. v. Seneca Coal Resources, LLC., et al.
as 1:2017cv00567
Plaintiff:
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
Defendant:
Seneca Coal Resources, LLC , Thomas M. Clarke , Ana M Clarke and others
Counter_claimant:
Seneca Coal Resources, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HERRON et al v. PODLESAK et al
as 3:2014cv06660
Plaintiff:
SCOTT HERRON and MORONA VIDRINE
Defendant:
DENNIS PODLESAK, DAVID J. MAZZO, B. JEFFERSON CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUCKER v. PODLESAK et al
as 3:2014cv05897
Plaintiff:
DEAN P. TUCKER
Defendant:
DENNIS PODLESAK, DAVID J. MAZZO, B. JEFFERSON CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leips v. Halim et al
as 1:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Clark Leips
Defendant:
Raouf Y. Halim, Michael T. Hayashi, Ming Louie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
