Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Harmon et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00212
Plaintiff:
CARLA HARMON and DOLA HARMON
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and COLOPLAST CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kinsey v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00155
Plaintiff:
MARLENE KINSEY
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and COLOPLAST CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOUGLAS v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE, LLC
as 4:2014cv00152
Plaintiff:
KIM DOUGLAS
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and COLOPLAST CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Szczepanik v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv20378
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Szczepanik
Defendant:
C. R. Bard Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
McKnight et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00017
Plaintiff:
Norma A. McKnight and Roger McKnight
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00388
Plaintiff:
Susan Austin
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mullins v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00357
Plaintiff:
Anna Marie Mullins
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cox et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00355
Plaintiff:
Emma L. Cox
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harmen v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00353
Plaintiff:
Elois Harmen
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cavazos v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
Carmen Cavazos
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
