Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Patterson Mims et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
Patterson Mims and Vera Mims
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , AO Smith Corporation, Advance Auto Parts Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Cleaver-Brooks Inc. and Ericsson Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Cleaver-Brooks Inc., 84 Lumber Company , AGCO Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Oates et al v. AO Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01229
Plaintiff:
Robert Oates, Sr. and Emmaline Oates
Defendant:
AO Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Biltrite Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Peerless Industries Inc. , Compudyne Corporation , Kentile Floors Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Peerless Industries Inc. , AO Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Patterson Mims et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2012cv01227
Defendant:
American Biltrite Inc., CNH America LLC, HB Smith Company Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Patterson Mims and Vera Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Davis et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01185
Defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Georgia Pacific LLC, Honeywell International Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Harry A. Davis and Madonna S. Davis
Cross Defendant:
Peerless Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Bounds et al v. Advance Auto Parts Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00645
Defendant:
Industrial Holdings Corporation, CBS Corporation, American Biltrite Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Arvinmeritor Inc., Rockwell Automation, Inc., Caterpillar Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Detroit Diesel Corporation
Special Master:
SPECIAL MASTER Vincent J. Poppiti, -SM-
Plaintiff:
Wanda Bounds and Estate of Jackie Bounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
