Cases 51 - 60 of 1,969
Hailey-Giannetti v. O'Malley
as 24-252
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL HAILEY-GIANNETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Calderon Lopez v. O'Malley
as 24-250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Macina v. O'Malley
as 24-204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONICA MACINA
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Lopez v. O'Malley
as 24-111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENNIFER M. LOPEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Castillo v. Kijakazi
as 24-41
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELAINE CASTILLO
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Administration
Hannah v. O'Malley
as 24-24
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BYRON KEITH HANNAH
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Peth v. O'Malley
as 23-4411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY KWABENA PETH
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Chavez v. O'Malley
as 23-4374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALIDA CHAVEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Bersie v. O'Malley
as 23-4377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMMIE JO BERSIE
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
