Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Alphabet Workers Union-Communication Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
as DC/1:24-CA-01003
Plaintiff: Alphabet Workers Union-Communication Workers
Defendant: National Labor Relations Board
Petitioner: Alphabet Workers Union-Communication Workers of America, Local 9009
Alphabet Workers Union-Communication Workers v. NLRB
as 24-1003
Petitioner: Alphabet Workers Union-Communication Workers of America, Local 9009
Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
FTC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 23-15992
Plaintiff / Appellant: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee: MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Amicus Curiae: LAW PROFESSORS, FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, JAHNA LINDERMUTH, DOUG PETERSON, HERBERT H. SLATERY III, and JOHN SUTHERS, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
National Association of Broadcast Employees & Tech v. NLRB
as 09/1:22-CA-70171
Plaintiff: National Association of Broadcast Employees & Tech
Defendant: NLRB
Petitioner: National Association of Broadcast Employees & Technicians, The Broadcasting and Calbe Television Workers Sector of the Communications Workers of America, Local 51, AFL-CIO
Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
National Association of Broadcast Employees & Tech v. NLRB
as 22-70171
Petitioner: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCAST EMPLOYEES & TECHNICIANS, THE BROADCASTING AND CABLE TELEVISION WORKERS SECTOR OF THE COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 51, AFL-CIO
Respondent: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Bradford, et al v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al
as 22-1023
Plaintiff / Appellant: DUKE BRADFORD, ARKANSAS VALLEY ADVENTURES, LLC, AKA AVA Rafting and Zipline and COLORADO RIVER OUTFITTERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States and others
Amicus Curiae: ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT, NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER and others
Petitioner: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
Natl Assn of Broadcast Empl, et al v. OSHA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4087
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCAST EMPLOYEES & TECHNICIANS, THE BROADCASTING AND CABLE TELEVISION WORKERS SECTOR OF THE COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 51, AFL-CIO
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Media Guild of the West v. OSHA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4103
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: MEDIA GUILD OF THE WEST, THE NEWS GUILD-COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 39213
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
The Denver Newspaper Guild, et al v. OSHA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4100
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402 and In re: MCP NO. 165, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: DENVER NEWSPAPER GUILD, COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 37074, AFL-CIO
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Amicus Curiae: CHARLES N. JEFFRESS, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER and others
The Denver Newspaper Guild, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 21-9592
Petitioner: THE DENVER NEWSPAPER GUILD, COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 37074 and AFL-CIO
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION and DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?