Cases 21 - 30 of 280
LINDERT v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67809
Plaintiff:
ROY LINDERT
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAZILE v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67801
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BAZILE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILLMANN v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67769
Plaintiff:
ELSIE R. GILLMANN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOHLS v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67893
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS H. KOHLS
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREDFICK v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67783
Plaintiff:
HARLAND A FREDFICK, SR
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ERICKSON v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67813
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ERICKSON
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YANTORNI v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67772
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN J YANTORNI
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, CE THURSTON & SONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOSZ v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67808
Plaintiff:
HELEN GOSZ
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LONG v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67782
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D LONG
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, CERTAINTED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KNAEBE v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67881
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVE KNAEBE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
