Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 141
GRAHAM et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66177
Plaintiff: SARAH GRAHAM
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLNER et al V. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION ET. AL.
as 2:2011cv66164
Plaintiff: ROBERT L MILLNER and BESSIE M MILLNER
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORCORAN et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65784
Plaintiff: PATRICK CORCORAN and MARIE CORCORAN
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STONE et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65998
Plaintiff: THOMAS M. STONE and MARY F. STONE
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATRISCIANO et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65322
Plaintiff: LOUIE E. MATRISCIANO and NANCY MATRISCIANO
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65568
Plaintiff: HOWARD P WILLIAMS and BETTY A WILLIAMS
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STONE v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65057
Plaintiff: WALTER STONE
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZEIGLER et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66143
Plaintiff: ERNEST ZEIGLER and MADELINE ZEIGLER
Defendant: ACANDS, INC., A. W.CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2001cv66177
Plaintiff: SARAH GRAHAM
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOLTZ v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64919
Plaintiff: JOHN CHRISTOPHER STOLTZ
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?