Cases
George Pappas, et al v. Countrywide Financial Corp., et al
as 14-55518
Plaintiff - Appellee: GEORGE PAPPAS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, FIRE & POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO, BARRY BRAHN and others
Objector - Appellant: THE BANK OF AMERICA 401(K) PLAN FOR LEGACY COMPANIES, as a Successor to the Countrywide Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP., ANGELO R. MOZILO, ERIC P. SIERACKI and others
The Government of Guam Retirement Fund et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv06239
Plaintiff: Alaska International Trust, Alaska Large-Cap Trust, Alaska Money Market Trust and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Countrywide Capital V, Countrywide Financial Corporation and others
Unknown: Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg En Welzijn
George Pappas, et al v. The BOA 401(k) Plan for Legacy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-55570
Plaintiff - Appellee: GEORGE PAPPAS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, FIRE & POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO, BARRY BRAHN and others
Objector - Appellant: THE BANK OF AMERICA 401(K) PLAN FOR LEGACY COMPANIES, as a Successor to the Countrywide Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP., ANGELO R. MOZILO, ERIC P. SIERACKI and others
Barry Brahn, et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporat, et al
as 09-80192
Plaintiff - Respondent: BARRY BRAHN, SHELLEY B. KATZEFF, GEORGE PAPPAS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Petitioner: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE SECURITIES CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE CAPITAL V and others
New York City Employees' Retirement System et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al Featured Case
as 2:2008cv00492
Plaintiff: New York City Employees' Retirement System, New York City Employees' Retirement System, New York City Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant: Countrywide Financial Corporation, Countrywide Capital V, Angelo R Mozilo and others
Estate Defendant: Carlos M Garcia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Marsha Steele v. Countrywide Capital V et al
as 2:2007cv07548
Plaintiff: Marsha Steele, Marsha Steele, Marsha Steele and others
Defendant: Countrywide Capital V, Countrywide Financial Corporation, Angelo Mozilo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Barry Brahn v. Countrywide Capital V et al
as 2:2007cv07259
Plaintiff: Barry Brahn, Barry Brahn, Barry Brahn and others
Defendant: Countrywide Capital V, Countrywide Financial Corporation, Angelo Mozilo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jack McBride v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv06083
Plaintiff: Jack McBride, Jack McBride, Jack McBride and others
Defendant: Countrywide Financial Corporation, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Countrywide Capital V and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
George Pappas v. Countrywide Financial Corp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv05295
Defendant: Martin R. Melone, Edwin Heller, Countrywide Home Loans Inc. and others
Petitioner: Jonathan Lee Riches, Dr Marshall J Orloff Ira RO FCC as Custodian AllianceBernstein US Focs Blnd, Patrick J Simpson and others
Consolidated Defendant: Grant Thornton LLP, KPMG LLP, Countrywide Securities Corporation and others
Not Classified By Court: Byron B Matthews, Jr, SRM Global Limited Fund Partnership, Independent Fiduciary Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado, Shelley B. Katzeff, Barry Brahn and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Thomas P DiNapoli and Marsha Steele
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Robert L Garber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?