Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Tharpe v. Georgia CVS Pharmacy LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01085
Plaintiff:
Dasha Tharpe
Defendant:
WEC 99D6 LLC, CVS Pharmacy Inc. and Georgia CVS Pharmacy LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DeBrock v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05118
Plaintiff:
Teresa DeBrock
Defendant:
ABC Corp., John/Jane Doe 1, Georgia CVS Pharmacy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jordan v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04324
Defendant:
Georgia CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C., CVS Pharmacy Store #04593, John Doe (Pharmacy Tech) and others
Plaintiff:
Kenny Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH et al v. CVS PHARMACY INC et al
as 5:2020cv00403
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY STORE #3874, ROGER WOOLWINE, CVS PHARMACY INC and others
Plaintiff:
ROY SMITH and CONNIE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. CVS PHARMACY INC et al
as 1:2020cv00200
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY STORE #3874, Roger Woolwine, CVS PHARMACY INC and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Smith and Connie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Palmer v. CVS Pharmacy Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03178
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy Inc. and C T Corporation
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Palmer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lowe v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02333
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., John Doe, LLC, John Doe, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Mae Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KILPATRICK v. GEORGIA CVS PHARMACY LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00073
Defendant:
JOHN DOES and GEORGIA CVS PHARMACY LLC
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER KILPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
POPE v. CVS HEALTH CORPORATION et al
as 7:2019cv00032
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY INC, CVS HEALTH CORPORATION and CVS
Plaintiff:
VALERIE POPE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LeBlanc v. Georgia CVS Pharmacy, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00159
Defendant:
A.B.C. and Georgia CVS Pharmacy, LLC
Plaintiff:
Robyn LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
