Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
WHITFIELD v. CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv13753
Plaintiff: MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant: CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC., TIMOTHY B. PAGE, KATHRYN G. JACKSON and others
CARDINALLI v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv02251
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff: CAY CARDINALLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAMBRY v. CAI
as 1:2021cv00052
Defendant: JUN CAI
Plaintiff: BERNAL SHAMBRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAMBRY v. CAI
as 1:2020cv20562
Defendant: JUN CAI
Plaintiff: BERNAL SHAMBRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wang v. Ping An Xi Le, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv20397
Plaintiff: Dao Feng Wang
Defendant: Qing Chi Cai, May Bao, HE CHENG RESTAURANT CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LIN-HENDEL et al v. AGRICULTURE BANK OF CHINA (ABCHINA) et al
as 2:2019cv16372
Defendant: AGRICULTURE BANK OF CHINA (ABCHINA), ZHOU MUBING, CAI DONG and others
Plaintiff: DR. CATHERINE GWEI-INN LIN-HENDEL and DR. RUDOLF HEINZ HENDEL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv14962
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
YANG v. TASTE OF NORTH CHINA, LTD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09392
Defendant: TASTE OF NORTH CHINA, LTD, NEW TASTE OF NORTH CHINA INC., QIMIN CAI and others
Plaintiff: Baoyu Yang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
FORERO v. APM TERMINALS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv13754
Defendant: SUNRISE METALS, INC., APM TERMINALS, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff: DOHENY FORERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAI v. SWITCH, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv10425
Plaintiff: MINGBO CAI
Defendant: SWITCH, INC., ROB ROY, GABE NACHT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?