Cases 41 - 50 of 189
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
XMS Capital Partners, LLC v. XLS Partners, Inc.
as 1:2018cv08549
Plaintiff:
XMS Capital Partners, LLC
Defendant:
XLS Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08488
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07983
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Westfield Insurance Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2018cv06330
Defendant:
Barry Stanek, LM Insurance Company, MB Real Estate Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company, an Ohio Corp. and Westfield Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. Pendrick Capital Partners II, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv06014
Defendant:
Pendrick Capital Partners II, LLC and Ability Recovery Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Anthony Anderson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sarrell v. Waupaca Foundry, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01192
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Christopher Adams and Jason Allen
Defendant:
Hitachi Metals America LTD Inc, Thyssenkrupp Waupaca Inc, Waupaca Foundry Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Sarrell and William Shadwick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gardner v. Harvard Collection Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03286
Plaintiff:
Necole Gardner
Defendant:
Harvard Collection Services, Inc. , Pendrick Capital Partners II, LLC and John Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
