Cases 31 - 40 of 228
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv60758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ghipsmann v. Empire Today, LLC et al
as 0:2022cv60590
Plaintiff:
Carla Ghipsmann
Defendant:
Empire Today, LLC and CHARLESBANK CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
WM Capital Partners XXXIV, LLC v. Bartholomew et al
as 1:2022mc20650
Defendant:
Leslie C Bartholomew, Leslie C. Bartholomew, Jr, John T Ruble and others
Plaintiff:
WM Capital Partners XXXIV, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND v. PHILLIPS et al
as 3:2022cv01269
Plaintiff:
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
Defendant:
Rupert Earl Phillips, Green Energy Contracting, LLC, Green Energy Development Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
