Cases 1 - 10 of 44
MILLHOUSE v. DEL TORO
as 1:2024cv02468
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO
Plaintiff:
KYLE J MILLHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
RICHARDSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY et al
as 1:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EUGENE RICHARDSON
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO, Franklin R. Parker, Elizabeth Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
VOEGELI v. DEL TORO
as 1:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS VOEGELI
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BORUD v. DEL TORO et al
as 1:2024cv01211
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BORUD
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY and BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
RODRIGUEZ v. DEL TORO
as 1:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TOMBLIN v. DEL TORO et al
as 1:2023cv03782
Plaintiff:
NICKY S TOMBLIN and NICKY S. TOMBLIN
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO and REAR ADMIRAL DARIN K. VIA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
MITCHELL v. DEL TORO
as 1:2023cv03775
Plaintiff:
ERNEST F MITCHELL and ERNEST F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
