Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Evan Shelton v. Elizabeth Valente, et al
as 19-3291
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PHILIP J. CHARVAT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Appellant:
TIMOTHY JOHNSON and EVAN E. SHELTON
Defendant / Appellee:
RESORT MARKETING GROUP, INC., ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., ELIZABETH VALENTE and others
Mark Dunlap v. Philip Charvat, et al
as 19-3280
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PHILIP J. CHARVAT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
RESORT MARKETING GROUP, INC., ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., ELIZABETH VALENTE and others
Appellant:
MARK DUNLAP, Objector
Vasquez et al v. Valente et al
as 1:2018cv01951
Plaintiff:
Erjona Vasquez , Loidy Tang , Joe Kean Tang and others
Defendant:
Elizabeth Valente, Resort Marketing Group, Inc., Carnival Corporation & PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Terry et al v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2013cv08414
Plaintiff:
Cassie Terry , Tammy Jones , Nathan R Means and others
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Charvat v. Travel Services et al
as 1:2012cv05746
Plaintiff:
Philip Charvat
Defendant:
Travel Services, Carnival Corporation & PLC, Royal Caribbean International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lobaton v. Carnival Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00598
Plaintiff:
Gary Lobaton
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation, Carnival PLC, Costa Crociere, S.p.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Todd v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2010cv07833
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation , First Class Vacations, Inc. and Millennium Travel and Promotions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Theys et al v. Carnival Corporation
as 2:2010cv01102
Plaintiff:
Emma Theys, Theys David and Electrical Construction Industry Health & Welfare Plan
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
