Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Jason Scott v. Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of California, LLC
as 2:2020cv03275
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott
Defendant:
Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of California, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Haro Bezdikian v. Round Sky, Inc., et al
as 2:2019cv05047
Defendant:
Round Sky, Inc., Does 1 through 25, inclusive and Round Sky, Inc. a Nevada corporation doing business as Cash Advance USA, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Mr. HARO BEZDIKIAN and Haro Bezdikian
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Souders v. Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of California, LLC
as 2:2018cv10592
Plaintiff:
Kristyna Souders
Defendant:
Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of California, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08647
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Michael Dotson v. Round Sky, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv08316
Plaintiff:
Michael Dotson
Defendant:
Round Sky, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them and Round Sky, Inc. doing business as Cash Advance USA, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01910
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018at00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
