Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,619
SMITH v. THE CELOTEX CORP.
as 2:2011cv65997
Plaintiff: EDWARD T. SMITH
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COTTON v. THE CELOTEX CORP.
as 2:2011cv65975
Plaintiff: WOODROW W. COTTON
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCOY v. THE CELOTEX CORP.
as 2:2011cv65872
Plaintiff: DAVID MCCOY
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEPPARD v. THE CELOTEX CORP.
as 2:2011cv65980
Plaintiff: BARTEMUS J. SHEPPARD
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOSHER v. THE CELOTEX CORP.
as 2:2011cv65979
Plaintiff: EDWARD T. MOSHER
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. THE CELOTEX CORP.
as 2:2011cv65978
Plaintiff: DON RAY EVANS
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KILBANE et al v. CELOTEX CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv64075
Plaintiff: FARRELL KILBANE and MARY KILBANE
Defendant: CELOTEX CORP. , RUBEROID CO., INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. ARMSTRONG WORLD et al
as 2:2011cv64067
Plaintiff: JAMES R. WILLIAMS
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD, ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOCKTOR et al v. CELOTEX CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv64070
Plaintiff: FRANCIS A. DOCKTOR and JEAN E. DOCKTOR
Defendant: CELOTEX CORP., CROWN CORK & SEAL, INC., RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURBRIDGE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv63575
Plaintiff: EARL BURBRIDGE, WILLIE M BURBRIDGE, IRIS BURBRIDGE JOHNSON and others
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORP, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING INC and others
Thirdparty_defendant: FLINTKOTE CO, ATLAS TURNER CO. and MH DETRICK CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?