Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Centex Homes et al v. Donegal Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv00682
Defendant: Donegal Mutual Insurance Company, Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company, Cincinnati Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Centex Homes a Nevada general partnership doing business as Centex Real Estate Corporation, Centex Construction of New Mexico, LLC, Pulte Homes of New Mexico, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Centex Homes et al v. Peleus Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff: CENTEX HOMES dba CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, CENTEX CONSTRUCTION OF NEW MEXICO, LLC, PULTE DEVELOPMENT NEW MEXICO, INC. and others
Defendant: PELEUS INSURANCE COMPANY, CENTRAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, HDI GLOBAL SPECIALTY SE fka INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE OF HANNOVER and others
Counter Defendant: Centex Homes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Centex Homes, a Nevada General Partnership et al
as 2:2018cv02526
Movant: AIG Specialty Insurance Company, American International Speciality Lines Insurance Company, Centex Homes, a Nevada General Partnership and others
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al v. Centex Homes, a Nevada general partnership et al
as 2:2015at01308
Plaintiff: Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Defendant: Centex Homes, a Nevada general partnership, Centex Real Estate Corporation, Centex Homes Realty Company, a Nevada corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, a Connecticut corporation et al v. Centex Homes, a Nevada general partnership et al
as 2:2015at01200
Plaintiff: Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, a Connecticut corporation and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, a Connecticut corporation
Defendant: Centex Homes, a Nevada general partnership, Centex Real Estate Corporation, a Nevada corporation and Does 1 through 10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company v. Centex Homes, a Nevada general partnership et al
as 1:2015at00824
Plaintiff: St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
Defendant: Centex Homes, a Nevada general partnership, Centex Real Estate Corporation, a Nevada corporation and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Type: Contract Insurance
Steadfast Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv04538
Movant: Centex Homes, a Nevada General Partnership, Lexington Insurance Company and Steadfast Insurance Company
Type: Contract Insurance
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, a Connecticut corporation v. Centex Homes, a Nevada general partnership et al
as 2:2015at00240
Plaintiff: St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, a Connecticut corporation
Defendant: Centex Homes, a Nevada general partnership, Centex Real Estate Corporation, a Connecticut corporation and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Centex Homes, a Nevada general partnership et al
as 2:2014at01563
Plaintiff: St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Defendant: Centex Homes, a Nevada general partnership and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Direct Development, Inc. v. American Safety Indemnity Company
as 2:2014cv06825
Counter Claimant: American Safety Indemnity Company
Cross Claimant: American Safety Indemnity Company
Defendant: American Safety Indemnity Company and Does
Counter Defendant: Centex Homes, a Nevada General Partnership, Direct Development, Inc., Does and others
Cross Defendant: Centex Homes, a Nevada General Partnership
Plaintiff: Direct Development, Inc. and Mid-Coast Builders Supply, Inc.
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?